S Corp Owners Must Set Reasonable Salary Before Taking Distributions
Accounting expert David Riggs outlines how S corp owners can navigate IRS compensation rules and reduce payroll tax exposure.
S corporation owners who draw income from their businesses face a two-step compensation structure that carries significant tax consequences if mishandled, according to accounting expert David Riggs, writing in HelloNation. Before taking shareholder distributions, working owners are required under IRS rules to pay themselves a reasonable salary — a threshold that triggers payroll taxes and demands careful documentation.
The determination of what qualifies as reasonable compensation is not arbitrary. Riggs points to several factors that inform the analysis: the owner's specific duties within the business, relevant experience and qualifications, the number of hours worked, and comparable wages paid to similarly positioned employees or contractors in the same industry. Each of these elements helps build the evidentiary record that the IRS expects should the figure ever be challenged.
Read more Independent Wealth Management Evolves With Fiduciary Focus →
The underlying tax mechanics explain why the distinction matters so much. Salaries paid through an S corporation are subject to payroll taxes, including Social Security and Medicare contributions. Shareholder distributions, by contrast, are not. That gap creates a financial incentive for owners to minimize salary and maximize distributions — precisely the pattern regulators scrutinize. Setting an unreasonably low salary to avoid payroll taxes is a well-documented audit trigger.
Riggs emphasizes that supporting documentation is not optional. Owners who lack records justifying their compensation decisions are exposed to IRS reclassification, which can result in back taxes, interest, and penalties. Maintaining contemporaneous records that reflect the rationale behind salary-setting decisions is the practical defense against such outcomes.
For small business owners operating as S corporations, the lesson is straightforward: the compensation structure must be intentional, defensible, and supported by written records that align with market standards. Continue reading at All Financial Services & Investing.
